Opened 9 years ago

Last modified 9 years ago

#66 new defect

consider discarding the linux-patch-inittmpfs

Reported by: dkg Owned by: jrollins
Priority: major Component: debirf
Keywords: Cc:
Sensitive:

Description

given that the nested approach is working well with stock debian kernels, is it worthwhile continuing to maintain the inittmpfs kernel patch?

Change History (2)

comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by jrollins

I was wondering this myself the other day. I don't know, though. I can see that it might be nice to have this package around, though, in case one did want to apply the patch for some reason (maybe not necessarily debirf related). i don't see that it needs to be associated with debirf, though.

Debirf includes fs/usr/bin/build-debirf-kernel. This is no longer necessary, so it should be removed from debirf. It might be nice to keep it's functionality somewhere else, though.

comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by dkg

I'm glad to see you already moved build-debirf-kernel over to the linux-patch-inittmpfs source tree. I'd prefer not to get rid of it until we complete some benchmarks about the difference in memory consumption between nested and stupid_simple initramfs strategies. it would be great to not need the kernel hacking part of this project.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.