source: trunk/jobs/toft/publicnotes/web/klein.html @ 220

Last change on this file since 220 was 220, checked in by dkg, 6 years ago

TOFT/PN: fixed up the presentation of the Klein piece.

File size: 25.4 KB
Line 
1<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
2<html>
3<head>
4<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
5<link rel="stylesheet" href="publicnotes.css" type="text/css">
6<link rel="stylesheet" href="klein.css" type="text/css">
7<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript" src="publicnotes.js"></script>
8<link rel="icon" href="icon.png" type="image/png" >
9<link rel="shortcut icon" href="icon.png" type="image/png" >
10<title>Time Out From Testing response to Joel Klein's Jan 25, 2007 testimony</title>
11</head>
12
13<body onload="PN.onLoad();">
14
15<div class="framing">
16  <div class="logo"><a href="http://www.timeoutfromtesting.org/"><img
17src="logo.png" title="Time Out From Testing" alt="Time Out From
18excessive and high-stakes Testing" /></a></div> On January 25, 2007,
19<acronym title="New York City Department of
20Education">NYCDOE</acronym> Chancellor Joel I. Klein gave testimony to
21the New York City Council Committee on Education about the Next Phase
22of the Children First Reforms.  The <acronym title="Department of
23Education">DOE</acronym> <a
24href="http://schools.nyc.gov/Administration/mediarelations/SpeechesTestimonials/20070126_jk_council.htm">published
25his remarks</a>.  We reprint them here, with commentary.</div>
26
27<h1>Time Out From Testing Responds to Chancellor Klein:</h1>
28
29<div class="maintext">
30 
31<p> Good afternoon Chairman Jackson and members of the Education
32Committee. Thank you for inviting me today to talk about our efforts
33to create the kind of public schools that New York City’s students
34need and deserve.
35 
36<p>Deputy Mayor Walcott just described the journey we’ve taken over <a
37href="#note0" id="base0" name="base0">the past four-plus years since
38Mayor Bloomberg took control of, and responsibility for, New York
39City’s schools</a>. Last week, as you know, the Mayor announced our
40next steps—what we will do to build on the progress we have
41made. These reforms, which I will discuss today, will take our schools
42and our system to a new, higher level. These steps are critically
43important because although we’ve made a great deal of progress in
44recent years, although <a href="#note1" id="base1" name="base1">our
45students are performing at a substantially higher level now than they
46were in 2002</a>, we still have a long way to go before our schools
47are able to provide all of New York City’s children with the education
48they need and deserve. And while our students and our system have
49improved a great deal, we must not accept the current reality, the
50status quo, as our maximum potential.
51 
52<p>Today, <a href="#note2" id="base2" name="base2">I will share with
53you the details of the next wave of our Children First school
54reforms</a>. But before I do that, I would like to put the reforms in
55context: everything we do, every reform we undertake, every initiative
56we pursue is a means to an end, and that end is giving every one of
57our students, regardless of personal circumstances, a fair chance at a
58successful, fulfilling, productive life in a world that increasingly
59demands unprecedented levels of knowledge and competence. When we
60called our reforms “Children First,” we meant it.
61 
62<p>Our efforts—the efforts that the Deputy Mayor just described and
63the efforts that I will describe in my testimony today—are built
64around <i>four</i> simple beliefs.
65
66<p><u>First</u>, I fundamentally reject “incrementalism” as a
67strategy.
68
69<p><a href="#note3" id="base3" name="base3">Across America and in New
70York City, education “reformers” have been claiming for years that
71<i>this</i> new initiative or <i>that</i> new program would fix what’s
72wrong in our schools.</a> We must be bold. We cannot afford to be
73anything but bold when <a href="#note4" id="base4"
74name="base4">140,000 of our 16- to 21-year-olds have dropped out of
75school or are about to</a>, when <a href="#note5" id="base5"
76name="base5">more than 60% of our eighth graders are still not reading
77or doing math at grade level</a>, and when our average <a
78href="#note6" id="base6" name="base6">African American and Latino
79students perform several grade levels below their peers</a>.
80
81<p><u>Second</u>, I fundamentally reject the notion that the
82challenges of urban education are insurmountable in light of failures
83endemic to our society or the difficult circumstances surrounding the
84lives of many students.
85
86<p>That is a common argument. But all it does is breed low
87expectations. It allows educators at all levels to say “we did our
88job” <i>even if</i> children fail—on the perverse theory that it is
89the children who are the problem. It is also flatly incorrect. Many of
90you have visited schools in our City that are proving this argument
91wrong every day—schools like Bronx Aerospace Academy, the Patrick
92F. Daly School in Brooklyn.
93
94<p><u>Third</u>, I fundamentally reject the idea that we should ask
95our great educators to succeed with children but deny them the
96authority and resources to craft the most effective path to success.
97
98<p>A system that spends countless millions “on behalf of” schools
99rather than letting educators spend it as <i>they</i> think most
100effective cannot succeed.
101
102<p><u>Fourth</u>, I fundamentally reject the notion that education,
103unlike every single other domain in American life, is not compatible
104with serious and meaningful accountability.
105
106<p>Accountability is fundamental in education—just like it is in every
107other field. Compensation doesn’t need to be lock-step. Good teaching
108<i>is</i> amenable to financial rewards. And, despite our best
109attempts, <i>not all</i> poor performing adults are remediable.
110
111<p>These principles provide the connective tissue of the Children
112First reforms as they have evolved and as they will continue to
113evolve.
114
115<p>Now, I’d like to describe the next wave of our reforms. The reforms
116involve four major changes that the mayor announced last week—plus one
117additional critical element that I am announcing today for the first
118time.
119
120<p>As the mayor announced last week, we will empower all of our
1211,400-plus principals to make more decisions about their school’s
122budgets, programs, and staffs. <u>Second</u>, we will hold principals
123and schools accountable for student results. <u>Third</u>, we will
124level the financial playing field so that all schools’ budgets are
125based on their student population and so that all schools can be held
126to the same high standards. <u>Finally</u>, because we know how
127important teachers are to student success, from now on, teacher tenure
128will no longer be the default position—we will grant it only to those
129educators who prove they are able to help our students make progress.
130
131<p>And today, I’d like to announce that we are developing a more
132robust and effective mechanism for parents—so they can resolve their
133concerns and play an even more hands-on role in their children’s
134education. We will also build the capacity of the school system to
135support meaningful parent engagement.
136
137<p>To do this, we are creating parent offices in each of our 32
138districts. These offices will give parents a neighborhood resource
139where they can find answers to questions that cannot be resolved at
140the school level. Our new parent offices will also help to train and
141provide support to parent coordinators and work with community groups
142serving parents to effectively get information out to parents in all
143of our communities and to hear their concerns. These parent officers
144will report dually to Community Superintendents and to someone who
145works directly for me—a new CEO of Parent Engagement.
146
147<p>The new CEO will develop a strategy for helping us to effectively
148engage and support parents in their efforts to help their children
149succeed and to provide accessible and timely information parents need
150about the school system. This plan will integrate all DOE
151parent-service resources. We envision that it will include a greater
152level of collaboration with parents and community groups that serve
153them. I believe parents are entitled to a meaningful opportunity for
154input into this new parent engagement plan. That’s why I've asked
155Advocates for Children, with over 35 years of assisting public school
156parents in this City and the parent organization of the
157Insideschools.org website, to help us shape our new initiative over
158the next few months and to advise on how to bring other groups and
159parents into that process. This collaboration demonstrates the serious
160nature of my commitment to increase our efforts to engage and assist
161our parents.
162
163<p>Now, I’d like to elaborate on the changes the Mayor described last
164week.
165
166<p>First, I will discuss empowerment.
167
168<p>Last year, 332 principals stepped up to a very simple challenge: In
169exchange for agreeing to become accountable for significant gains in
170student achievement, they would be given substantially greater
171authority over their schools. In essence, we stripped dollars from the
172bureaucracy, gave them directly to the schools, and gave principals
173the power to make the core decisions about programming, staffing, and
174resources that affect their students and their schools.
175
176<p>We called these schools “Empowerment Schools,” and I am pleased to
177report that they are off to a strong start.
178
179<p>Starting in the next school year, ALL of our principals, not just
180those leading Empowerment Schools, will be given the power of
181choice—the power to select the <i>support system</i> that they believe
182will best enable them to succeed for their students. Principals,
183working with their teams and consulting with their School Leadership
184Teams, will be able to decide among three types of School Support
185Organizations. These new support structures will replace the 10
186Regions that we created a few years ago to stabilize the school
187system.
188
189<p>First, schools can become Empowerment Schools, joining the 332
190schools that have already chosen this more streamlined system of
191support.
192
193<p>Second, they can choose to partner with a Learning Support
194Organization (LSO). Four of our most accomplished Regional
195Superintendents—Kathleen Cashin, Judy Chin, Marcia Lyles, and Laura
196Rodriguez—will have the funds and the discretion to build these LSOs,
197creating options that will be attractive and available to all schools.
198
199<p>Lastly, principals can choose to partner with an <i>external
200</i>Partnership Support Organization (PSO). We know from our
201experience that these groups have much to offer. They are unafraid to
202innovate and willing to challenge orthodoxies. So, if principals
203believe that bringing in support and expertise from outside the DOE is
204the key to their students’ success, they should have that
205option. These partner organizations might include any of the
206non-profit intermediary organizations that are already working with
207many of our schools. They might also include other non-profits or
208colleges and universities.
209
210<p>Through a Request for Proposal Process, we will screen prospective
211partners and develop a menu of DOE authorized Partnership Support
212Organizations from which principals may choose.
213
214<p>Any school in the City—whether it’s in Brooklyn, the Bronx, Staten
215Island, Queens, or Manhattan—will be able to choose any of these
216options. Support will no longer be based on where a school is. It will
217be based on what kind of support is best for a school.
218
219<p>Under <u>all</u> the support options, the DOE will continue to set
220and enforce academic standards, develop rigorous curricula, and hold
221schools to a common and demanding set of accountabilities. The DOE
222will also continue to make all employment decisions, including whether
223to hire or terminate principals. And all collective bargaining
224agreements continue to apply. In this new system, the 32 Community
225Superintendents will retain all the rights and authority required by
226law and will report directly to me. And, of course, all schools must
227comply with city, state, and federal law.
228
229<p>I will retain the right to intervene in a school, regardless of its
230choice of support partner, if things are headed in the wrong
231direction. And we will continue to provide the basic systems
232(financial, human resources, data and communications) to serve schools
233so they don’t have to reinvent their own infrastructure or lose the
234advantages of scale.
235
236<p>Let me now turn to the second major reform, accountability.
237
238<p>Accountability is the natural partner of empowerment. Together,
239they have real power to drive student achievement. Just as it is
240unfair to hold principals accountable for results without giving them
241the authority to deliver them, it is a mistake to give schools broad
242discretion and not hold them strictly accountable for results.
243
244<p>Our accountability system will enlist parents as partners to help
245us make sure that schools succeed. To be effective advocates for their
246children, they need good information. By providing new information to
247parents, and by making reports to parents more thorough,
248comprehensive, and accessible, as well as easier to understand, we
249will help parents make better choices and be better advocates for
250their children.
251
252<p>So, every school will receive a Progress Report with an overall
253letter grade (A – F) that compares it both to similar schools and the
254City’s best schools. The grades will be based on performance (where a
255school stands in absolute terms), progress (whether and how fast a
256school’s students are improving) and items related to school
257environment (including the results of new surveys of parents,
258teachers, and students). With these surveys, we will find out what
259parents, teachers, and students think is working—and not working—at
260schools and we’ll have real information to help us fix problems and
261learn how to build on strengths.
262
263<p>In addition, starting this year all schools are receiving on-site
264“Quality Reviews,” during which skilled educators observe teaching,
265and interview the principal, teachers, parents, and students at each
266school. These reviews are summarized in a detailed report that is
267available to parents and all New Yorkers online and that schools
268should be directly providing to their parents.
269
270<p>And, we are offering schools new tools to enable educators to
271measure and analyze how well our students are learning and to adjust
272instruction accordingly. We are providing all schools with <i>periodic
273assessments, </i>which are diagnostic tools used over the course of
274the year to help teachers adjust instruction to each student's
275individual needs in time to make an immediate difference. Over time,
276parents will receive reports on these assessments as well, so they can
277track the progress of their children along with teachers.
278
279<p>To help make all of this new information available in a timely way,
280we are launching a powerful new achievement data system called the
281Achievement Reporting and Innovation System (ARIS). This will put
282critical information at the fingertips of principals, teachers, and
283parents.
284
285<p>As I’ve said, all schools will be graded based on their success
286with students. Those with the top ratings will receive bonuses for
287serving as demonstration sites for others. Top schools will be
288eligible as well for additional funds for struggling students they
289choose to accept from poor performing schools. And those schools
290identified as the poorest performers face leadership changes and
291ultimately restructuring or closure.
292
293<p>Now, I would like to discuss the third major reform: building a
294funding system that is fairer, clearer, and better at helping kids
295achieve.
296
297<p>Despite real improvements over the last four years, today we still
298have a funding system that falls short of those goals. Today, we send
299money to schools according to 90 separate funding formulas. What’s
300worse, the biggest pots of money follow the weakest logic. They are
301distributed largely based on historical patterns. They carry forward
302decisions made long ago, based on political deals, not the current
303needs of our kids.
304
305<p>This means two schools with similar enrollments can receive
306completely different amounts of money. For example, one school in our
307city with about 550 kids and a poverty rate of more than 80% receives
308$5,500 per student in general education tax dollars. Another school
309with the same number and mix of students receives $3,500 per
310student. That means one school gets $1 million more in general tax
311dollars than the other.
312
313<p>This is not about rich versus poor, one borough versus
314another. This is about senseless disadvantages that strike every
315community and every corner of our City.
316
317<p>Instead of proliferating an unjust and unfair status quo, we
318propose a simple reform called Fair Student Funding. From here on out,
319we’re going to fund the people who matter most—the kids.
320
321<p>At every school, every student will carry a base level of tax levy
322funding based on grade level. Then, on top of that, we’ll offer
323additional funds to kids who cost more to educate based on their
324unique characteristics: because they are poor, learning English,
325performing poorly, or in certain specialized schools, like our testing
326high schools.
327
328<p>Under this plan, two schools with the same mixes of kids will get
329the same amounts of City tax dollars. (In addition, they’ll also
330continue to get federal and state categorical dollars, like Title I,
331as they had before.) It is so simple that we’ll eventually be able to
332explain to principals most of their budgets on one clean page.
333
334<p>And we are going to move forward with the benefit of the views of
335parents, teachers, and other stakeholders. We are engaging in an
336extensive schedule of community engagement through which I have no
337doubt that this initiative will be refined and improved.
338
339<p>Now, I’d like to turn to the final of the four reforms the mayor
340announced: improving the quality of our most important asset, our
341teachers.
342
343<p>I know and you know how fundamental good teachers are to our
344students’ success. Research convincingly shows that effective teaching
345is the single most important factor separating student success and
346failure. The vast majority of the 80,000 teachers in our schools are
347hard-working, talented, and committed. Our challenge is to make sure
348that <i>all</i> students are taught by successful teachers.
349
350<p>We’ve already taken a number of steps to attract and retain good
351teachers and to create incentives to reward our best teachers. Since
352the Mayor took office, we’ve increased the starting teacher salary by
35343%, making it easier to attract and retain high-quality educators for
354our children. With the United Federation of Teachers, we ended the
355practice of “bumping,” and “force-placing,” which previously required
356principals to hire teachers even if they weren’t qualified or a good
357fit for their school. We also created a $15,000 housing bonus to help
358recruit teachers in shortage areas such as math, science and special
359education. And we created a Lead Teacher program, which allows us to
360reward teachers with an additional $10,000 a year to mentor and coach
361other teachers while also teaching students.
362
363<p>But we must do even more if our schools are to be empowered to
364build the best team possible to educate our children. We are taking a
365major step in this direction.
366
367<p>We intend to make tenure a well-deserved honor, not a routine
368right. Today tenure is nearly automatic. About 99% of teachers who
369serve for three years in our system receive tenure as a matter of
370course. This is the default position. We want as many teachers as
371possible to become tenured, but we want them to earn it. This is so
372important because once a teacher has tenure, he or she basically has
373life-time job security.
374
375<p>Accordingly, principals will receive a new set of supports and
376tools to ensure that this incredibly important decision is made in a
377rigorous, thoughtful, and fact-based manner. We look forward to
378working with the UFT in this effort. And because an affirmative tenure
379decision affects not only an individual school but the entire system,
380we will also insist that a principal’s recommendation be reviewed by
381appropriate personnel outside the school, notably the Community
382Superintendent. Indeed, so critical is the tenure decision that Mayor
383Bloomberg will meet annually with each group of newly tenured teachers
384to celebrate their accomplishment.
385
386<p>I’d like to conclude with an obvious point: The changes that we are
387discussing today will not be easy. They will not be painless. And they
388will not be without controversy.
389
390<p>But they are necessary for our kids, our city, and our nation. The
391stakes are too high for timidity or tinkering. I look forward to
392working with you as we move forward together.
393
394<p>Thank you. We would be pleased to answer any questions.
395
396</div>
397<hr>
398<div class="notes">
399<h1 id="note-section-header">Commentary</h1>
400
401<div class="note"><a class="notetitle" href="#base0" id="note0"
402name="note0">the past four-plus years since Mayor Bloomberg took
403control of, and responsibility for, New York City’s schools</a><div
404class="notebody">Mayor Bloomberg and Chancellor Klein have had
405responsibility for NYC schools since 2002, almost five years.  When do
406the people of NYC get to hold them accountable for their decisions and
407actions?</div></div>
408
409
410<div class="note"><a class="notetitle" href="#base1" id="note1"
411name="note1">our students are performing at a substantially higher
412level now than they were in 2002</a><div class="notebody">Fourth grade
413scores for the city’s English tests did increase from 2002 to 2005,
414but in 2006, they decreased. Math scores dropped 6.5 percentage
415points.  On the 2006 NY State English tests, fifth grade scores
416dropped 10 percentage points from the previous year.
417  <p>
418Significantly, Chancellor Klein avoids the question of eighth grade
419scores when, according to the DOE, tests require “higher order
420thinking” skills.  In 2006, after a year of costly test prep with
421Princeton Review, nearly 2/3’s of eighth graders failed to meet
422English standards and only 38.9% met math standards – a drop of 2
423percentage points from the previous year.</div></div>
424
425<div class="note"><a class="notetitle" href="#base2" id="note2"
426name="note2">I will share with you the details of the next wave of our
427Children First school reforms</a><div class="notebody"> Chancellor
428Klein’s Children First reforms indicate that as students progress
429through the school system, they continue to fall steadily behind.  In
4302006:<ul>
431      <li>3rd grade, 61.5% of students met English standards
432      <li>4th grade, 58.9% met standards
433      <li>5th grade, 56.7% met standards
434      <li>6th grade, 48.6% met standards
435      <li>8th grade, only 36.6% of students met English standards.</ul>
436     
437The same downward trend has occurred in math.  All these figures are
438based on testing results available from <a
439href="http://schools.nyc.gov/">the <acronym title="Department of Education">DOE</acronym>’s web
440site</a>.
441<p>
442Will New York City’s “miracle” resemble Houston’s where federal
443investigators found that city’s rising test scores had more to do with
444unethical manipulation than “miracles” (<a title="The Texas Miracle"
445href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/08/23/60II/main637913.shtml">CBS
446News, 2004</a>)? In fact, in 2005, when English test scores jumped
447considerably for the fourth grade, several NYC lawmakers and testing
448experts questioned the validity of the test gains (<a title="Higher Test Scores Mean Progress"
449href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F0071FFE3C550C7B8EDDAF0894DD404482">NYT,
4506/28/05</a>)</div></div>
451
452<div class="note"><a class="notetitle" href="#base3" id="note3"
453name="note3">Across America and in New York City, education
454“reformers” have been claiming for years that <i>this</i> new
455initiative or <i>that</i> new program would fix what’s wrong in our
456schools.</a><div class="notebody"> Chancellor Klein expresses
457skepticism about those who say they’re fixing the schools with “this
458. . . initiative” or “that . . . program. ” The Chancellor, however,
459has just proposed his third reorganization of the DOE in five years.
460Klein explains these attempts as an “evolution,” but in fact he had
461never indicated that his earlier attempts to change the system were
462temporary.  Whether his attempts are part of a calculated strategy or
463a seat-of-the-pants response, they have been costly, with each change
464resulting in additional budgets and unsettling disruptions.
465</div></div>
466
467
468<div class="note"><a href="#base4" id="note4" name="note4">140,000 of
469our 16- to 21-year-olds have dropped out of school or are about
470to</a><div class="notebody">Chancellor Klein admits that 140,000
47116-to-21-year-olds drop out or are dropping out of school. Those
472students were only 10 to15 years old in 2002, when the mayor and
473chancellor first took charge.  Shouldn’t the mayor and chancellor be
474held accountable for those 140,000 students?<p>Furthermore,
475Bloomberg and Klein say New York City has a 58.2% high school
476graduation rate. But the New York State Department of Education puts
477New York City’s graduation rate at 43.5%.</div></div>
478
479
480<div class="note"><a href="#base5" id="note5" name="note5">more than
48160% of our eighth graders are still not reading or doing math at grade
482level</a><div class="notebody"> Chancellor Klein acknowledges that
483more than 60% of the current eighth grade children read or do math
484below grade level.  But, the current 8th graders were 2nd graders when
485Klein became chancellor. Clearly these children have not benefited
486from the chancellor’s Child First reforms and reorganizations.
487</div></div>
488
489<div class="note"><a href="#base6" id="note6" name="note6">African
490American and Latino students perform several grade levels below their
491peers</a><div class="notebody">The Harvard Civil Rights Project says
492that graduation statistics for NYC Hispanic and African American
493students average about 33%,</div></div>
494
495</div>
496</body> </html>
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.