source: trunk/jobs/toft/publicnotes/web/klein.html @ 214

Last change on this file since 214 was 214, checked in by dkg, 6 years ago

TOFT/PN: added initial text of kleins speech.

File size: 19.4 KB
Line 
1<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
2<html>
3<head>
4<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-15">
5<link rel="stylesheet" href="publicnotes.css" type="text/css">
6<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript" src="publicnotes.js"></script>
7<link rel="icon" href="icon.png" type="image/png" >
8<link rel="shortcut icon" href="icon.png" type="image/png" >
9<title>Example page for commentary view</title>
10</head>
11
12<body onload="PN.onLoad();">
13<a href="http://schools.nyc.gov/Administration/mediarelations/SpeechesTestimonials/20070126_jk_council.htm">original text</a>
14<div class="maintext">
15 
16<p> Good afternoon Chairman Jackson and members of the Education
17Committee. Thank you for inviting me today to talk about our efforts
18to create the kind of public schools that New York City’s students
19need and deserve.
20 
21<p>Deputy Mayor Walcott just described the journey we’ve taken over
22the past four-plus years since Mayor Bloomberg took control of, and
23responsibility for, New York City’s schools. Last week, as you know,
24the Mayor announced our next steps—what we will do to build on the
25progress we have made. These reforms, which I will discuss today, will
26take our schools and our system to a new, higher level. These steps
27are critically important because although we’ve made a great deal of
28progress in recent years, although our students are performing at a
29substantially higher level now than they were in 2002, we still have a
30long way to go before our schools are able to provide all of New York
31City’s children with the education they need
32and deserve. And while our students and our system have improved a
33great deal, we must not accept the current reality, the status quo, as
34our maximum potential.
35 
36<p>Today, I will share with you the details of the next wave of our
37Children First school reforms. But before I do that, I would like to
38put the reforms in context: everything we do, every reform we
39undertake, every initiative we pursue is a means to an end, and that
40end is giving every one of our students, regardless of personal
41circumstances, a fair chance at a successful, fulfilling, productive
42life in a world that increasingly demands unprecedented levels of
43knowledge and competence. When we called our reforms “Children First,”
44we meant it.
45 
46<p>Our efforts—the efforts that the Deputy Mayor just described and
47the efforts that I will describe in my testimony today—are built
48around <i>four</i> simple beliefs.
49
50<p><u>First</u>, I fundamentally reject “incrementalism” as a
51strategy.
52
53<p>Across America and in New York City, education “reformers” have
54been claiming for years that <i>this</i> new initiative or <i>that</i>
55new program would fix what’s wrong in our schools. We must be bold. We
56cannot afford to be anything but bold when 140,000 of our 16- to
5721-year-olds have dropped out of school or are about to, when more
58than 60% of our eighth graders are still not reading or doing math at
59grade level, and when our average African American and Latino students
60perform several grade levels below their peers.
61
62<p><u>Second</u>, I fundamentally reject the notion that the
63challenges of urban education are insurmountable in light of failures
64endemic to our society or the difficult circumstances surrounding the
65lives of many students.
66
67<p>That is a common argument. But all it does is breed low
68expectations. It allows educators at all levels to say “we did our
69job” <i>even if</i> children fail—on the perverse theory that it is
70the children who are the problem. It is also flatly incorrect. Many of
71you have visited schools in our City that are proving this argument
72wrong every day—schools like Bronx Aerospace Academy, the Patrick
73F. Daly School in Brooklyn.
74
75<p><u>Third</u>, I fundamentally reject the idea that we should ask
76our great educators to succeed with children but deny them the
77authority and resources to craft the most effective path to success.
78
79<p>A system that spends countless millions “on behalf of” schools
80rather than letting educators spend it as <i>they</i> think most
81effective cannot succeed.
82
83<p><u>Fourth</u>, I fundamentally reject the notion that education,
84unlike every single other domain in American life, is not compatible
85with serious and meaningful accountability.
86
87<p>Accountability is fundamental in education—just like it is in every
88other field. Compensation doesn’t need to be lock-step. Good teaching
89<i>is</i> amenable to financial rewards. And, despite our best
90attempts, <i>not all</i> poor performing adults are remediable.
91
92<p>These principles provide the connective tissue of the Children
93First reforms as they have evolved and as they will continue to
94evolve.
95
96<p>Now, I’d like to describe the next wave of our reforms. The reforms
97involve four major changes that the mayor announced last week—plus one
98additional critical element that I am announcing today for the first
99time.
100
101<p>As the mayor announced last week, we will empower all of our
1021,400-plus principals to make more decisions about their school’s
103budgets, programs, and staffs. <u>Second</u>, we will hold principals
104and schools accountable for student results. <u>Third</u>, we will
105level the financial playing field so that all schools’ budgets are
106based on their student population and so that all schools can be held
107to the same high standards. <u>Finally</u>, because we know how
108important teachers are to student success, from now on, teacher tenure
109will no longer be the default position—we will grant it only to those
110educators who prove they are able to help our students make progress.
111
112<p>And today, I’d like to announce that we are developing a more
113robust and effective mechanism for parents—so they can resolve their
114concerns and play an even more hands-on role in their children’s
115education. We will also build the capacity of the school system to
116support meaningful parent engagement.
117
118<p>To do this, we are creating parent offices in each of our 32
119districts. These offices will give parents a neighborhood resource
120where they can find answers to questions that cannot be resolved at
121the school level. Our new parent offices will also help to train and
122provide support to parent coordinators and work with community groups
123serving parents to effectively get information out to parents in all
124of our communities and to hear their concerns. These parent officers
125will report dually to Community Superintendents and to someone who
126works directly for me—a new CEO of Parent Engagement.
127
128<p>The new CEO will develop a strategy for helping us to effectively
129engage and support parents in their efforts to help their children
130succeed and to provide accessible and timely information parents need
131about the school system. This plan will integrate all DOE
132parent-service resources. We envision that it will include a greater
133level of collaboration with parents and community groups that serve
134them. I believe parents are entitled to a meaningful opportunity for
135input into this new parent engagement plan. That’s why I've asked
136Advocates for Children, with over 35 years of assisting public school
137parents in this City and the parent organization of the
138Insideschools.org website, to help us shape our new initiative over
139the next few months and to advise on how to bring other groups and
140parents into that process. This collaboration demonstrates the serious
141nature of my commitment to increase our efforts to engage and assist
142our parents.
143
144<p>Now, I’d like to elaborate on the changes the Mayor described last
145week.
146
147<p>First, I will discuss empowerment.
148
149<p>Last year, 332 principals stepped up to a very simple challenge: In
150exchange for agreeing to become accountable for significant gains in
151student achievement, they would be given substantially greater
152authority over their schools. In essence, we stripped dollars from the
153bureaucracy, gave them directly to the schools, and gave principals
154the power to make the core decisions about programming, staffing, and
155resources that affect their students and their schools.
156
157<p>We called these schools “Empowerment Schools,” and I am pleased to
158report that they are off to a strong start.
159
160<p>Starting in the next school year, ALL of our principals, not just
161those leading Empowerment Schools, will be given the power of
162choice—the power to select the <i>support system</i> that they believe
163will best enable them to succeed for their students. Principals,
164working with their teams and consulting with their School Leadership
165Teams, will be able to decide among three types of School Support
166Organizations. These new support structures will replace the 10
167Regions that we created a few years ago to stabilize the school
168system.
169
170<p>First, schools can become Empowerment Schools, joining the 332
171schools that have already chosen this more streamlined system of
172support.
173
174<p>Second, they can choose to partner with a Learning Support
175Organization (LSO). Four of our most accomplished Regional
176Superintendents—Kathleen Cashin, Judy Chin, Marcia Lyles, and Laura
177Rodriguez—will have the funds and the discretion to build these LSOs,
178creating options that will be attractive and available to all schools.
179
180<p>Lastly, principals can choose to partner with an <i>external
181</i>Partnership Support Organization (PSO). We know from our
182experience that these groups have much to offer. They are unafraid to
183innovate and willing to challenge orthodoxies. So, if principals
184believe that bringing in support and expertise from outside the DOE is
185the key to their students’ success, they should have that
186option. These partner organizations might include any of the
187non-profit intermediary organizations that are already working with
188many of our schools. They might also include other non-profits or
189colleges and universities.
190
191<p>Through a Request for Proposal Process, we will screen prospective
192partners and develop a menu of DOE authorized Partnership Support
193Organizations from which principals may choose.
194
195<p>Any school in the City—whether it’s in Brooklyn, the Bronx, Staten
196Island, Queens, or Manhattan—will be able to choose any of these
197options. Support will no longer be based on where a school is. It will
198be based on what kind of support is best for a school.
199
200<p>Under <u>all</u> the support options, the DOE will continue to set
201and enforce academic standards, develop rigorous curricula, and hold
202schools to a common and demanding set of accountabilities. The DOE
203will also continue to make all employment decisions, including whether
204to hire or terminate principals. And all collective bargaining
205agreements continue to apply. In this new system, the 32 Community
206Superintendents will retain all the rights and authority required by
207law and will report directly to me. And, of course, all schools must
208comply with city, state, and federal law.
209
210<p>I will retain the right to intervene in a school, regardless of its
211choice of support partner, if things are headed in the wrong
212direction. And we will continue to provide the basic systems
213(financial, human resources, data and communications) to serve schools
214so they don’t have to reinvent their own infrastructure or lose the
215advantages of scale.
216
217<p>Let me now turn to the second major reform, accountability.
218
219<p>Accountability is the natural partner of empowerment. Together,
220they have real power to drive student achievement. Just as it is
221unfair to hold principals accountable for results without giving them
222the authority to deliver them, it is a mistake to give schools broad
223discretion and not hold them strictly accountable for results.
224
225<p>Our accountability system will enlist parents as partners to help
226us make sure that schools succeed. To be effective advocates for their
227children, they need good information. By providing new information to
228parents, and by making reports to parents more thorough,
229comprehensive, and accessible, as well as easier to understand, we
230will help parents make better choices and be better advocates for
231their children.
232
233<p>So, every school will receive a Progress Report with an overall
234letter grade (A – F) that compares it both to similar schools and the
235City’s best schools. The grades will be based on performance (where a
236school stands in absolute terms), progress (whether and how fast a
237school’s students are improving) and items related to school
238environment (including the results of new surveys of parents,
239teachers, and students). With these surveys, we will find out what
240parents, teachers, and students think is working—and not working—at
241schools and we’ll have real information to help us fix problems and
242learn how to build on strengths.
243
244<p>In addition, starting this year all schools are receiving on-site
245“Quality Reviews,” during which skilled educators observe teaching,
246and interview the principal, teachers, parents, and students at each
247school. These reviews are summarized in a detailed report that is
248available to parents and all New Yorkers online and that schools
249should be directly providing to their parents.
250
251<p>And, we are offering schools new tools to enable educators to
252measure and analyze how well our students are learning and to adjust
253instruction accordingly. We are providing all schools with <i>periodic
254assessments, </i>which are diagnostic tools used over the course of
255the year to help teachers adjust instruction to each student's
256individual needs in time to make an immediate difference. Over time,
257parents will receive reports on these assessments as well, so they can
258track the progress of their children along with teachers.
259
260<p>To help make all of this new information available in a timely way,
261we are launching a powerful new achievement data system called the
262Achievement Reporting and Innovation System (ARIS). This will put
263critical information at the fingertips of principals, teachers, and
264parents.
265
266<p>As I’ve said, all schools will be graded based on their success
267with students. Those with the top ratings will receive bonuses for
268serving as demonstration sites for others. Top schools will be
269eligible as well for additional funds for struggling students they
270choose to accept from poor performing schools. And those schools
271identified as the poorest performers face leadership changes and
272ultimately restructuring or closure.
273
274<p>Now, I would like to discuss the third major reform: building a
275funding system that is fairer, clearer, and better at helping kids
276achieve.
277
278<p>Despite real improvements over the last four years, today we still
279have a funding system that falls short of those goals. Today, we send
280money to schools according to 90 separate funding formulas. What’s
281worse, the biggest pots of money follow the weakest logic. They are
282distributed largely based on historical patterns. They carry forward
283decisions made long ago, based on political deals, not the current
284needs of our kids.
285
286<p>This means two schools with similar enrollments can receive
287completely different amounts of money. For example, one school in our
288city with about 550 kids and a poverty rate of more than 80% receives
289$5,500 per student in general education tax dollars. Another school
290with the same number and mix of students receives $3,500 per
291student. That means one school gets $1 million more in general tax
292dollars than the other.
293
294<p>This is not about rich versus poor, one borough versus
295another. This is about senseless disadvantages that strike every
296community and every corner of our City.
297
298<p>Instead of proliferating an unjust and unfair status quo, we
299propose a simple reform called Fair Student Funding. From here on out,
300we’re going to fund the people who matter most—the kids.
301
302<p>At every school, every student will carry a base level of tax levy
303funding based on grade level. Then, on top of that, we’ll offer
304additional funds to kids who cost more to educate based on their
305unique characteristics: because they are poor, learning English,
306performing poorly, or in certain specialized schools, like our testing
307high schools.
308
309<p>Under this plan, two schools with the same mixes of kids will get
310the same amounts of City tax dollars. (In addition, they’ll also
311continue to get federal and state categorical dollars, like Title I,
312as they had before.) It is so simple that we’ll eventually be able to
313explain to principals most of their budgets on one clean page.
314
315<p>And we are going to move forward with the benefit of the views of
316parents, teachers, and other stakeholders. We are engaging in an
317extensive schedule of community engagement through which I have no
318doubt that this initiative will be refined and improved.
319
320<p>Now, I’d like to turn to the final of the four reforms the mayor
321announced: improving the quality of our most important asset, our
322teachers.
323
324<p>I know and you know how fundamental good teachers are to our
325students’ success. Research convincingly shows that effective teaching
326is the single most important factor separating student success and
327failure. The vast majority of the 80,000 teachers in our schools are
328hard-working, talented, and committed. Our challenge is to make sure
329that <i>all</i> students are taught by successful teachers.
330
331<p>We’ve already taken a number of steps to attract and retain good
332teachers and to create incentives to reward our best teachers. Since
333the Mayor took office, we’ve increased the starting teacher salary by
33443%, making it easier to attract and retain high-quality educators for
335our children. With the United Federation of Teachers, we ended the
336practice of “bumping,” and “force-placing,” which previously required
337principals to hire teachers even if they weren’t qualified or a good
338fit for their school. We also created a $15,000 housing bonus to help
339recruit teachers in shortage areas such as math, science and special
340education. And we created a Lead Teacher program, which allows us to
341reward teachers with an additional $10,000 a year to mentor and coach
342other teachers while also teaching students.
343
344<p>But we must do even more if our schools are to be empowered to
345build the best team possible to educate our children. We are taking a
346major step in this direction.
347
348<p>We intend to make tenure a well-deserved honor, not a routine
349right. Today tenure is nearly automatic. About 99% of teachers who
350serve for three years in our system receive tenure as a matter of
351course. This is the default position. We want as many teachers as
352possible to become tenured, but we want them to earn it. This is so
353important because once a teacher has tenure, he or she basically has
354life-time job security.
355
356<p>Accordingly, principals will receive a new set of supports and
357tools to ensure that this incredibly important decision is made in a
358rigorous, thoughtful, and fact-based manner. We look forward to
359working with the UFT in this effort. And because an affirmative tenure
360decision affects not only an individual school but the entire system,
361we will also insist that a principal’s recommendation be reviewed by
362appropriate personnel outside the school, notably the Community
363Superintendent. Indeed, so critical is the tenure decision that Mayor
364Bloomberg will meet annually with each group of newly tenured teachers
365to celebrate their accomplishment.
366
367<p>I’d like to conclude with an obvious point: The changes that we are
368discussing today will not be easy. They will not be painless. And they
369will not be without controversy.
370
371<p>But they are necessary for our kids, our city, and our nation. The
372stakes are too high for timidity or tinkering. I look forward to
373working with you as we move forward together.
374
375<p>Thank you. We would be pleased to answer any questions.
376
377</div>
378<hr>
379<div class="notes">
380<h1>Commentary</h1>
381
382
383</div>
384</body> </html>
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.